Once again, there’s a bunch of stories being floated around (like this one) about how everyone’s star sign is different and wrong, astrology is completely ignorant of astronomy and therefore inaccurate, and of course how us astrologers and astrology lovers are just ignorant of all science of any kind. Bunch of low IQ knuckle draggers, we are! I don’t think many of my readers believe the stories being circulated about how astrological Sun signs are no longer accurate, since my readers tend to be more astrology literate (and more literate in general) but I have seen questions about this showing up in my blog dashboard coming from search engines, so I figure it’s as great a time as any to clarify:
Your astrology sign has not changed and will never change.
The reason behind these stories claiming everyone’s zodiac sign is different than what astrologers are telling people, and that there’s a 13th sign called Ophiucus that astrologers aren’t telling the population about, is because NASA and other astronomical organizations will occasionally send out news of changes in the location of constellations. The constellations do move. What astronomers don’t ever trouble themselves to clarify when they trash astrology publicly is that the constellations do not figure into astrological zodiac signs. The zodiac signs share their names with the constellations, but yes astrologers do know the difference.
Astrology uses a 360 degree circle divided into 12 separate signs of 30 degrees each. The starting point of the circle is based not on the starting point of constellations but the beginning of the March equinox, since the astrological zodiac is based on an Earth view relationship to the Sun. Just as your wall calendar is divided into 12 segments based on our relationship to the Sun. The starting point at the March equinox is known as “the Aries point” which is zero degrees of the astrological sign Aries. This has never changed and will never change and it’s not because astrologers are ignorant of astronomy (in 2016?! puh-leez) but because we use a different system of measurement. The static astrological system of measurement used by astrologers just shares the names of the moving astronomical constellations, that’s all.
You’re still the sign you think you are, ok?
A few years back, the very astute traditional astrologer Deborah Houlding did a full writeup for Astrodienst clarifying the confusion, if you are looking for an in-depth explanation I recommend reading the highlighted link. Per Houlding’s article:
“Why is the zodiac divided into twelve equal divisions, rather than any other number of equal or unequal divisions? For the same reason that there are twelve calendar months in a year. The zodiac is a circle which maps out the Sun’s position throughout the year… Hence the zodiac adopts the general template that is used in all calendars: there are four major divisions, defined in the zodiac by four equal quarters separated by 90°, which determine where the ecliptic intersects with the equator to create the astronomical commencement of the four seasons…
The zodiac is a very elegant combination of astronomical and calendrical principles. Although the correlation of zodiac degrees and days in a year is not precise, the use of the zodiac as a reference system that monitors planetary movements and interactions, or considers the impact of seasonal changes, remains perfectly valid. The system has a great depth of philosophical reasoning built into its design, partly because the period in which its development began to aid mathematical astronomy occurred at the time that philosophers, such as Pythagoras, were exploring the mystical nature of shapes and geometrical relationships, and generating metaphysical theories on why numerical arrangements could determine qualities as well as quantities…”
Memorize Houlding’s explanations for the next time some science-ier than thou smartass tries to puff themselves up by ridiculing astrology lovers.